Complimentary Compliance Risk Assessment

Is Your Compliance In Line With Current Market Standards?

When a major customer demands a full-material disclosure (FMD) or IMDS entry tomorrow morning, can you deliver it accurately without scrambling or guessing?

Do 100% of your suppliers currently provide valid, up-to-date REACH SVHC, CMR, and PFAS declarations or are you chasing half of them every quarter?

Have you conducted restricted-substance testing on all product families in the last 18 months, or are you relying on 3- to 5-year-old lab reports?

If California Prop 65, TSCA PBT, or the new PFAS & EMRT restrictions hit your raw materials next month, will you know before your competitor or customer does?

When GADSL or a major OEM adds a new substance (it happens 2–4 times per year), does your team get alerted automatically or do you find out after the fact?

If a regulator or key customer walked in tomorrow and asked for proof of compliance on every regulation that applies to your product/s (REACH, RoHS, Biocidal, Food Contact, Medical, etc.), are you confident you could supply it expediently?

Are your operators, engineers, and quality team owning compliance or are they stretching themselves thin not assuming full ownership?

When R&D hands a new resin to Procurement, does Compliance get looped in on day one or only after Sales has already promised the customer a ship date?

How many orders are you losing because Procurement can’t get clean supplier specifications/declarations fast enough, leaving Sales stuck in limbo or lost?

Are your internal material specs up to date or do they lock out every restricted substance and give Procurement 2+ approved alternatives?

Do you have a live heat-map showing which suppliers are high-risk for REACH, Prop 65, or GADSL non-conformances or are you "assuming" they are up to current standards?